The Full Picture
The Housing Crisis in Numbers
The data behind why Project Rebirth exists — and why 3D-printed additive construction is not just a good idea, but the most urgent solution available.
The Scale of the Problem
City-by-City: Unhoused Population
Point-in-time counts, 2024–2025
% shown above each bar = recent rate of increase
Housing Costs Are Outpacing Everything
US median home price vs. median monthly rent, 2019–2024
| Year | Median Home Price | Median Rent/mo |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $258,000 | $1,080/mo |
| 2020 | $293,000 | $1,100/mo |
| 2021 | $347,000 | $1,200/mo |
| 2022 | $400,000 | $1,400/mo |
| 2023 | $410,000 | $1,550/mo |
| 2024 | $412,500 | $1,650/mo |
3D Printing vs. Traditional Construction
Cost per square foot and time to structural shell
Cost / sq ft (USD)
Days to structural shell
The Bandage Economy
Here is what we have watched for decades: governments allocate hundreds of millions of dollars to task forces, studies, temporary shelters, and short-term housing subsidies — and then declare progress. New Orleans spent $216.3 million on homelessness initiatives between 2019 and 2024. The unhoused population still rose 22%. Phoenix built over 1,400 shelter beds in two years. Then federal funding expired, and every gain was erased in a single count cycle. Hawaii nearly doubled its homeless population in one year after a wildfire destroyed 2,200 structures — and the primary bottleneck to recovery is still, two years later, the availability of permanent housing.
Organizations hold press conferences. Politicians offer statements. Frustrated civilians — rightfully outraged — take to social media to demand change. But frustration without a solution is just noise.
We are done making noise. We built a solution.
We Are Not Just Building Homes
Every structure we build is a statement about the kind of world we believe is possible.
Traditional construction generates massive waste, relies on energy-intensive supply chains, and leaves a carbon footprint that compounds with every new development. The communities hardest hit by the resulting climate instability — from the Maui wildfires that destroyed over 2,200 structures in a single night, to the flooding that repeatedly displaces families in New Orleans — are the same communities already carrying the heaviest burden of housing insecurity.
We are not building affordable housing that happens to be green. We are building the infrastructure of a sustainable civilization.
Our additive construction model uses low-carbon, rapid-curing composite materials engineered for structural permanence and thermal efficiency. Every unit we deploy is a high-quality, durable home that treads lightly on the earth — because the people we serve deserve both. Not one or the other. Both.
Why 3D-Printed Additive Construction
When we discovered additive construction technology, the path forward became clear. Here is the reality we cannot ignore:
The median home price in the United States hit $412,500 in 2024 — a 60% increase since 2019. Rents have risen 54% over the past decade. In Arizona alone, rent prices rose 84% between 2019 and 2024. The supply of rental units priced at $1,000 or less per month shrank by over 7 million units in the last decade — while high-rent luxury units surged 153%. Home buying fell to its lowest level in 30 years in 2024. These numbers affect real families in every city and town across America — families who work hard, play by the rules, and still cannot get ahead because the cost of simply having a roof over their heads keeps rising faster than their wages.
3D-printed additive construction disrupts every one of those variables:
• A traditional home costs $150–$300 per square foot to build. 3D-printed construction delivers comparable structures at $70–$150 per square foot — up to 45% less. • A traditional structural shell takes months. A 3D-printed structural shell can be completed in under 48 hours. • The technology uses low-carbon, rapid-curing composite materials — which qualify for government sustainability grants and dramatically reduce the environmental cost of construction. • The process requires advanced technical skills — which means it creates high-paying, high-demand jobs in the communities building the homes.
There is also a pressing urgency: major corporations have identified this technology, and they are beginning to move toward controlling it. If 3D-printed construction becomes monopolized by the same market forces that inflated traditional housing, we will simply rebuild the same unaffordable system with newer machines.
But if we move now — if we bring the people who need this technology most into the training pipeline, into the workforce, and into the building process — we change the equation entirely. We drive costs down. We create pathways to homeownership for families who have never had one. We make affordable housing not a charity program, but an economic reality. And we build something that lasts.
This is a systemic engine — and it takes all of us.
Partner With Us